Prosecuting the War Crime of Collective Punishment: Is it Time to Amend the Rome Statute?

Posted: 22 Mar 2010

See all articles by Shane Darcy

Shane Darcy

National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG) - Irish Centre for Human Rights

Date Written: March 2010

Abstract

Recent judgments of the Special Court for Sierra Leone comprise the most significant judicial consideration of collective punishment by an international court since the trials conducted after the Second World War. The Special Court’s conviction of several individuals for the war crime of collective punishment are the first of their kind, although at times the judgments involved strained judicial reasoning on the meaning, scope and rationale of the war crime of collective punishment. In considering the status of collective punishment as an international crime, the author draws on the Special Court’s jurisprudence and explores the customary and conventional law basis of the war crime of collective punishment and the challenge of defining the elements of such a crime. The omission of the war crime of collective punishment from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court questions the place of the offence in contemporary international criminal law, particularly in light of the possibility that underlying acts might be adequately addressed by other established war crimes.

Suggested Citation

Darcy, Shane, Prosecuting the War Crime of Collective Punishment: Is it Time to Amend the Rome Statute? (March 2010). Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 29-51, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1575973 or http://dx.doi.org/mqp083

Shane Darcy (Contact Author)

National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG) - Irish Centre for Human Rights ( email )

Galway
Ireland

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
322
PlumX Metrics