Using Mixed Methods in Monitoring and Evaluation: Experiences from International Development
30 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016
There are 2 versions of this paper
Using Mixed Methods in Monitoring and Evaluation: Experiences from International Development
Using Mixed Methods in Monitoring and Evaluation: Experiences from International Development
Date Written: March 1, 2010
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the various ways in which mixing qualitative and quantitative methods could add value to monitoring and evaluating development projects. In particular it examines how qualitative methods could address some of the limitations of randomized trials and other quantitative impact evaluation methods; it also explores the importance of examining "process" in addition to "impact" , distinguishing design from implementation failures, and the value of mixed methods in the real-time monitoring of projects. It concludes by suggesting topics for future research -- including the use of mixed methods in constructing counterfactuals, and in conducting reasonable evaluations within severe time and budget constraints.
Keywords: Poverty Monitoring & Analysis, Scientific Research & Science Parks, Science Education, Poverty Impact Evaluation, Statistical & Mathematical Sciences
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Vijayendra Rao and Ana M. Ibáñez
-
Assisting the Transition from Workfare to Work: A Randomized Experiment
By Emanuela Galasso, Martin Ravallion, ...
-
Is Knowledge Shared within Households?
By Martin Ravallion, Kaushik Basu, ...
-
If You Build it, Will They Come? School Availability and School Enrollment in 21 Poor Countries
By Deon Filmer
-
Welfare Impacts of Rural Electrification: A Case Study from Bangladesh
By Shahidur R. Khandker, Douglas F. Barnes, ...
-
By Joseph Shapiro and Jorge O. Moreno