CCP Working Paper 10/04
23 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 2010 Last revised: 8 Apr 2014
Date Written: March 2, 2010
EU competition law prohibits the abuse of a dominant position. An example of abuse is the charging of unfair prices. This prohibition in Article 102TFEU has been used to sanction excessive prices that are ‘too high’. According to the ECJ in United Brands, a price is abusive if (i) the price-cost margin is excessive and (ii) the price is unfair compared to other prices. However, there is little guidance to determine whether a price is excessive and/or unfair. We consider whether the principle of dual entitlement, which is consistent with most people’s perceptions of when prices are unfair relative to others, can be used to define explicitly what constitutes an unfair price in terms of the second stage of the United Brands test. We show that in general this principle is in line with the goals of an effective prohibition of excessive pricing and develop a procedure that defines a price as unfair in terms of this principle. We also show that European competition law enforcers in their attempts to define prices as unfair relative to others have followed similar arguments as the procedure developed here. Therefore, this procedure could go some way to resolve one of a number of problems regarding the prohibition of excessive prices.
Keywords: unfair pricing prohibition, excessive pricing, dual entitlement, abuse of dominant position, behavioural law and economics
JEL Classification: K21, L40
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Akman, Pinar and Garrod, Luke, When are Excessive Prices Unfair? (March 2, 2010). CCP Working Paper 10/04. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1578181 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1578181