References (48)



Checking Election Outcome Accuracy, Post-Election Audit Sampling Methods

Kathy Anne Dopp


March 26, 2010

Methods for determining post-election audit sampling have been the subject of extensive recent research. This article (1) provides an overview of post-election audit sampling methods, focusing on risk-limiting audits, (2) advances and improves three methods for calculating risk-limiting election audit samples, showing how to apply precise margin error bounds to improve the accuracy of existing methods by using new margin error bounds, sampling weights and sampling probabilities that improve the effectiveness of existing approaches for any size audit unit and for single or multi-winner election contests, and (3) provides a new method for estimating post-election audit sample sizes whenever detailed data, expertise, or tools are not available.

Post-election auditing is vital to restoring public oversight over the integrity of an electoral process that has been largely privatized without independent checks and balances.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 30, 2010 ; Last revised: August 14, 2013

Suggested Citation

Dopp, Kathy Anne, Checking Election Outcome Accuracy, Post-Election Audit Sampling Methods (March 26, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1579182 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1579182

Contact Information

Kathy Anne Dopp (Contact Author)
Independent ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 739
Downloads: 139
Download Rank: 165,490
References:  48