Footnotes (258)



The Case for a 'Limited' Protection of Trademark Merchandising

Irene Calboli

Texas A&M University School of Law; Singapore Management University - School of Law

April 2011

University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming
Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 10-17

Since its “judicial creation” in the 1970s, much controversy has surrounded the practice of trademark merchandising. Because of the departure from the traditional interpretation of trademark law - protecting consumers and the market - in favor of a direct protection of trademark “value,” trademark scholars have generally opposed the recognition of merchandising rights. Despite this opposition, courts and the legislature have nonetheless favored the acceptance of this practice by steadily increasing the scope of trademark protection in the past decades, notably by introducing the concept of confusion as to the products’ “sponsorship” or “affiliation” as part of the standard for trademark infringement. Not surprisingly, trademark scholars have criticized these developments and to date no solution has been found in this area of the law. This Article argues against this situation and offers an alternative position to the opposition to merchandising so far expressed by the majority of scholars. Specifically, this Article accepts that, in the modern economy, the concept of commercial “source” could also include products’ “sponsorship” and “affiliation.” Accordingly, this Article recognizes that the use of trademarks on promotional products that are offered for sale could legitimately serve the traditional distinctive function of trademarks, and indicate to the public the origin of the marked products, at least in terms of trademark owners’ “sponsorship” and “affiliation”. Contrary to common criticism, this recognition of merchandising marks as legitimate “source indicators” would not negatively affect the market or consumers. Instead, it would finally provide a clear guideline in this important area of the law, and subject this practice to the general rules for the acquisition and enforcement of trademark rights as well as to existing trademark defenses and fair uses.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: trademark, trademark merchandising, trademark infringement, trademark licensing

JEL Classification: K00, K11

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 1, 2010 ; Last revised: April 20, 2011

Suggested Citation

Calboli, Irene, The Case for a 'Limited' Protection of Trademark Merchandising (April 2011). University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming; Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 10-17. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1580251

Contact Information

Irene Calboli (Contact Author)
Texas A&M University School of Law
1515 Commerce St.
Fort Worth, TX 76102
United States

Singapore Management University - School of Law ( email )
60, Stamford Road
Level 4
Singapore, 178900

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,901
Downloads: 279
Download Rank: 85,449
Footnotes:  258
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper