Religious Torts: Applying the Consent Doctrine as Definitional Balancing

38 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2010

See all articles by Richard L. Cupp

Richard L. Cupp

Pepperdine University - Rick J. Caruso School of Law

Date Written: 1986

Abstract

Tort actions based on religiously motivated conduct necessitate delicate balancing between the governmental interest in providing redress to injured plaintiffs and the Constitution’s guarantee of religious free exercise. This Comment argues that when plaintiffs were members of defendant churches at the time of the alleged tort, a definitional balancing standard is the most appropriate means of measuring the competing interests. The proposed standard is based on the traditional tort law consent doctrine. The standard’s definitional element shifts the burden of proving lack of consent to member/plaintiffs.

Keywords: tort, Constitution, religion, religious, church, free exercise, consent, litigation, First Amendment

Suggested Citation

Cupp, R.L., Religious Torts: Applying the Consent Doctrine as Definitional Balancing (1986). UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 19, 1986, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1582590

R.L. Cupp (Contact Author)

Pepperdine University - Rick J. Caruso School of Law ( email )

24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States
(310) 506-4658 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
52
Abstract Views
844
rank
451,832
PlumX Metrics