Footnotes (226)



Rethinking the Commercial Law Treaty

John F. Coyle

University of North Carolina School of Law

Georgia Law Review, Vol. 45, p. 343, 2011
UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1582898

In international commercial transactions, it is not always clear which state’s law will apply to govern a particular contract. Historically, states have sought to address this problem by means of two types of treaties. The first aims to solve the problem by bringing about the substantive unification of commercial law across multiple jurisdictions; once the law is everywhere the same, then it no longer matters which state’s law applies to govern the contract. The second aims to solve the problem in part by empowering the transacting parties to choose the law that will govern their contract; once these parties know that their choice of law will be respected by national courts, then the uncertainty as to the governing law goes away.

The conventional wisdom has long been that substantive unification represents the better approach to solving the problem of legal uncertainty. This Article challenges that conventional wisdom to argue that, in fact, a choice-of-law approach may be superior. It does so, first, by identifying weaknesses in the two rationales that have most frequently been advanced in favor of substantive commercial law treaties – that they are uniquely able to reduce transaction costs and that they offer law uniquely suited to the needs of international commercial transactions. The Article then explains how a choice-of-law treaty could lead to the development of better commercial law that more accurately captures the preferences of parties engaged in international commerce by facilitating the development of an international market for commercial law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 5, 2010 ; Last revised: January 28, 2011

Suggested Citation

Coyle, John F., Rethinking the Commercial Law Treaty. Georgia Law Review, Vol. 45, p. 343, 2011; UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1582898. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1582898

Contact Information

John F. Coyle (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina School of Law ( email )
Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States
919-843-9634 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.unc.edu/faculty/directory/coylejohnf/

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,178
Downloads: 173
Download Rank: 133,819
Footnotes:  226