Voters, Dictators, and Peons: Expressive Voting and Pivotality
32 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2010 Last revised: 3 Jun 2014
Date Written: May 1, 2010
Abstract
Why do the poor vote against redistribution? We experimentally examine one explanation, namely that individuals gain direct expressive utility from voting in accordance with their ideology and understand they are unlikely to be pivotal; hence, their expressive utility, even if arbitrarily small, entirely determines their voting behavior. In contrast with a basic prediction of this explanation, we find that the probability of being pivotal does not affect the impact of monetary interest on whether a subject votes for redistribution.
Keywords: redistribution, ideology, expressive voting
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
A Little Fairness May Induce a Lot of Redistribution in Democracy
-
Voting When Money and Morals Conflict: An Experimental Test of Expressive Voting
-
Social Identity and Preferences Over Redistribution
By Esteban F. Klor and Moses Shayo
-
Social Identity and Preferences Over Redistribution
By Esteban F. Klor and Moses Shayo
-
Moral Bias in Large Elections: Theory and Experimental Evidence
By Timothy J. Feddersen, Sean Gailmard, ...
-
Preferences for Redistribution and Pensions: What can We Learn from Experiments?
-
By Moses Shayo and Alon Harel