The Business Judgement Defence - Insights from ASIC v. Rich

Companies and Securities Law Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2010

18 Pages Posted: 12 Apr 2010 Last revised: 22 Feb 2012

Date Written: March 25, 2010

Abstract

In ASIC v Rich Justice Austin provides the first comprehensive judicial analysis of the statutory business judgment defence in s 180(2). The judgment addresses important, mostly unanswered, questions for directors and officers around the use of the business judgment defence: What is a business judgment? Who bears the onus of proof? What is the relationship between the defence and the primary duty of care and diligence in s 180(1)? What is the role of the common law business judgment rule? What does the business judgment defence require? What is the effect of the requirement for a “rational belief”? This article analyses the judgment and extracts some general guidance about how the defence can be usefully applied by managers taking defensible commercial risks.

This is an updated version of a paper of the same title that appeared in Company and Securities Law Journal (2010) 28 Companies and Securities Law Journal 3.

Keywords: Directors’ duties, corporate law, business judgment rule, corporate governance

Suggested Citation

Lumsden, Andrew J., The Business Judgement Defence - Insights from ASIC v. Rich (March 25, 2010). Companies and Securities Law Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1584652

Andrew J. Lumsden (Contact Author)

Corrs Chambers Westgarth ( email )

Governor Phillip Tower
1 Farrer Place
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,102
Abstract Views
4,196
rank
19,073
PlumX Metrics