Conflicts of Interest, Reputation, and the Interwar Debt Crisis: Banksters or Bad Luck?
HEID Working Paper No. 02/2010
44 Pages Posted: 12 Apr 2010
There are 3 versions of this paper
Conflicts of Interest, Reputation, and the Interwar Debt Crisis: Banksters or Bad Luck?
Conflicts of Interest, Reputation, and the Interwar Debt Crisis: Banksters or Bad Luck?
Conflicts of Interest, Reputation, and the Interwar Debt Crisis: Banksters or Bad Luck?
Date Written: February 1, 2010
Abstract
This paper builds a new dataset with detailed information on the universe of foreign government bonds issued in New York in the 1920s and uses these data to describe the behavior of the financial intermediaries which operated in the New York market during the period leading to the interwar debt crisis. The paper starts by showing that concerns over reputation played an important role in intermediaries' underwriting choices. Next, the paper checks whether banks managed to charge abnormal underwriting fees on bonds that would eventually default and finds no evidence of such practice ("banksterism"). The paper concludes by discussing some parallels between the experience of the 1920s and the current debate on the "originate and distribute" model.
Keywords: Glass-Steagall Act, conflicts of interest, interwar debt crisis, reputation
JEL Classification: F34, G14, G15, G18
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Certification Drag: The Opinion Puzzle and Other Transactional Curiosities
-
Conflicts of Interest, Reputation, and the Interwar Debt Crisis: Banksters or Bad Luck?
By Marc Flandreau, Norbert Gaillard, ...
-
Lawyer Exceptionalism in the Gatekeeping Wars
By Sung Hui Kim
-
Intermediaries Revisited: Is Efficient Certification Consistent with Profit Maximization?
-
The Gathering Storm: Contingent Liabilities in a Sovereign Debt Restructuring
By Lee C. Buchheit and Mitu Gulati