Understanding Decreasing CDS Curves
22 Pages Posted: 18 Apr 2010
Date Written: April 1, 2008
Abstract
One of the major input for evaluating a Credit Default Swap (CDS) position is the so-called CDS curve. This curve gives the term structure of the CDS: for some maturities (typically: 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 7 years and 10 years) a market spread is given. The spread is the premium to pay to a counterparty to protect one unit of currency during one year.
Most of the time, CDS curves are increasing: the larger the maturity (i.e. the longer the time period we want to protect against a credit event), the larger the spread. As from the beginning of the Credit crisis (Summer 2007), some CDS curves were reverted, meaning that they contained decreasing parts: the spread (premium given on an annual basis) to pay for having protection for m_1 years is larger than the spread to pay for having protection for m_2>m_1 years. In some pathological cases, when the reversion is quite important, these reverted curves caused the blocking of some CDS pricers. The goal of this report is to understand these pricer blockings from a practical and quantitative perspective.
Our analysis is based on a market-driven model for pricing CDS products, assuming a piecewise linear cumulative density function for the implied default probabilities. In spite of its simplicity, the model is quite general because only few assumptions are made, and provides manageable closed-form expressions for some interesting quantities. In this paper, the following key results will be derived: -Closed-form solutions are obtained for some important quantities, allowing a deep understanding of the effects of the underlying parameters; -It is shown that there is no theoretical objection to the existence of decreasing parts in CDS curves; -However, indeed, there exists a threshold on the intensity of these reversions: the CDS curves cannot contain parts being arbitrarily decreasing. If the CDS curve contains too strongly reverted parts than allowed (according to the above-mentioned threshold), then it is natural that the pricer fails to return a valid cumulative default probability curve; -Finally, a business meaning of this "reverting threshold" is given in terms of arbitrage opportunities.
Keywords: credit default swaps, CDS, spread curve, arbitrage
JEL Classification: G12
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Explaining the Rate Spread on Corporate Bonds
By Edwin J. Elton, Martin J. Gruber, ...
-
The Determinants of Credit Spread Changes
By Pierre Collin-dufresne, J. Spencer Martin, ...
-
How Much of Corporate-Treasury Yield Spread is Due to Credit Risk?
By Jing-zhi Huang and Ming Huang
-
How Much of the Corporate-Treasury Yield Spread is Due to Credit Risk?
By Jing-zhi Huang and Ming Huang
-
How Much of the Corporate-Treasury Yield Spread is Due to Credit Risk?
By Jing-zhi Huang and Ming Huang
-
Corporate Yield Spreads: Default Risk or Liquidity? New Evidence from the Credit-Default Swap Market
By Francis A. Longstaff, Sanjay Mithal, ...
-
Equity Volatility and Corporate Bond Yields
By John Y. Campbell and Glen B. Taksler
-
Equity Volatility and Corporate Bond Yields
By John Y. Campbell and Glen B. Taksler
-
Structural Models of Corporate Bond Pricing: An Empirical Analysis
By Young Ho Eom, Jing-zhi Huang, ...
-
By Roberto Blanco, Simon Brennan, ...