Maritime Interdiction of Weapons of Mass Destruction

Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 12, pp. 1-36, 2007

Posted: 19 Apr 2010

See all articles by Douglas Guilfoyle

Douglas Guilfoyle

University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Australian Defence Force Academy

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

This article examines current multilateral and bilateral efforts to interdict the maritime transport of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), their delivery systems and related ‘precursors’ used in their construction. The US-led Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) has focused international attention on the proliferation of WMD, including proliferation by maritime transport. While the PSI’s Statement of Interdiction Principles focuses on existing bases of jurisdiction under domestic and international law, the interdiction framework within which it operates has now been broadened. New legal bases for maritime WMD interdiction include US bilateral shipboarding agreements, the 2005 Protocol to the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation Convention and, potentially, UN Security Council Resolution 1540 if it affects the law of the territorial sea. Starting from a consideration of the existing framework of maritime jurisdiction, this article examines the history and likely effectiveness of these new measures, including the creation of new crimes of maritime proliferation.

Keywords: weapons of mass destruction, WMD, proliferation, Proliferation Security Initiative, PSI, International law, international law of the sea, jurisdiction

Suggested Citation

Guilfoyle, Douglas, Maritime Interdiction of Weapons of Mass Destruction (2007). Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 12, pp. 1-36, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1591821

Douglas Guilfoyle (Contact Author)

University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Australian Defence Force Academy ( email )

Sydney, NSW 2052
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
291
PlumX Metrics