The Inauthentic Claim
95 Pages Posted: 21 Apr 2010
Date Written: April 20, 2010
This Article argues that third parties should be able to invest in lawsuits to a much greater degree than is currently permitted in most jurisdictions in the United States. The laws of assignment and maintenance limit the freedom of litigants to sell all or part of their lawsuits to strangers. I argue in the Article that the foundation of both doctrines is based on something I call the theory of “the inauthentic claim.”
The theory of the inauthentic claim asserts that there is a quality, separate and in addition to legal validity, which confers “authenticity” to a lawsuit. It does not presuppose that “inauthentic” lawsuits are more likely to be spurious, fraudulent, or frivolous than “authentic” lawsuits. It holds, instead, that the mere fact that a third party involved him or herself in the suit for the wrong reasons (either by taking an assignment in the suit or supporting the suit), is proof that the suit is against public policy.
This Article examines two arguments that might be used to defend the theory of the inauthentic claim, one from history and one from jurisprudence. I conclude that neither argument is persuasive. I conclude the Article by sketching a research agenda based on empirical evidence that would help policymakers and judges choose the socially optimal set of rules for third party investment in litigation.
Keywords: assignment, maintenance, champerty, chose in action, nonassignability, corrective justice
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Reinventing Structural Reform Litigation: Deputizing Private Citizens in the Enforcement of Civil Rights
It's Not About the Money!: A Theory on Misconceptions of Plaintiffs' Litigation Aims
By Tamara Relis
When Perception Changes Reality: An Empirical Study of Investors' Views of the Fairness of Securities Arbitration
By Jill Gross and Barbara Black
Reforming State Consumer Protection Liability: An Economic Approach
Damage-Based Contingency Fees in Employment Cases: A Survey of Practitioners
By Richard Moorhead and Rebecca Cumming
Federal Administration and Administrative Law in the Gilded Age
Collective Redress in Europe: The New Model
California Employment Discrimination Law and its Enforcement: The Fair Employment and Housing Act at 50
By Gary Blasi and Joseph W. Doherty
Are State Consumer Protection Acts Really Little-FTC Acts?
By Henry N. Butler and Joshua D. Wright
Consumer (In)Justice: Reflections on Canadian Consumer Class Actions