A Contingency Approach to Representative Bureaucracy: Power, Equal Opportunities and Diversity
International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 76, No. 2, 2010
32 Pages Posted: 24 Apr 2010
Date Written: April 22, 2010
In this paper we develop a contingency approach to representative bureaucracy. We argue that representative bureaucracy is a multidimensional and changing concept, and that in the academic and policy debate on representative bureaucracy three different dimensions are intermingled: Power, equal opportunities and diversity. These dimensions do not only reflect a particular view on the role of the state and the relation between the state and citizens. They also diverge in the motives for making the bureaucracy representative. Even the conception of what representation means can be totally different. We conclude that modern diversity management approaches alone may not contribute to nation building because these mainly emphasize organisational performance. Approaches to representative bureaucracy in nation building must also be built on moral arguments and underline the exemplary role of the state. In addition, the political viability of managerial and moral approaches needs to be taken into account through acknowledging political realities and existing distributions of power in society.
Keywords: Democracy, diversity, equal opportunity, legitimacy, nation building, power, representative bureaucracy
JEL Classification: D73, J7, J78
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
China's High Saving Rate: Myth and Reality
The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions
By Edward J. Zajac and James D. Westphal
Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies
By Alexandra Kalev, Frank Dobbin, ...
Legal Ambiguity and the Politics of Compliance: Affirmative Action Officers' Dilemma
By Lauren B. Edelman, Stephen Petterson, ...
The Dangers of Decoupling: The Relationship between Compliance Programs, Legitimacy Perceptions, and Institutionalized Misconduct
By Tammy L. Maclean and Michael Behnam
Where is the Accountability in International Accountability Standards?: A Decoupling Perspective
By Michael Behnam and Tammy L. Maclean
Growth and Global Imbalances: The Role of Learning-by-Exporting
Reversing the Queue: Performance, Legitimacy, and Minority Hiring
By Andrew Hill and David A. Thomas