The Adoption of Offset Presses in the Daily Newspaper Industry in the United States
34 Pages Posted: 21 Jul 1999 Last revised: 3 Nov 2022
Date Written: April 1999
Abstract
This paper shows that the move to offset printing from letterpress in the U.S. daily newspaper publishing industry was determined, in part, by the structure of the local market. Although in monopoly markets, low circulation papers were quicker to adopt than high circulation papers, the ranking was reversed within duopoly markets. In such markets, the smaller firms adopted four years later than the larger one did. This result is partially consistent with preemption models of adoption. Hazard analysis further shows that in markets in which one firm has exited, the remaining duopolist is less likely to adopt than otherwise, consistent with preemption, and at odds with a declining industry explanation. Further analysis shows that the adoption was determined, at least in part, at the firm rather than the newspaper level, although, on the whole, newspaper chains adopted neither earlier nor later than non-chain newspapers. Ceteris paribus, adoption occurred more quickly in non-industrial states.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Free Entry and Social Inefficiency in Radio Broadcasting
By Steven Berry and Joel Waldfogel
-
Who Benefits Whom in Daily Newspaper Markets?
By Joel Waldfogel and Lisa M. George
-
Product Quality and Market Size
By Steven Berry and Joel Waldfogel
-
Product Quality and Market Size
By Steven Berry and Joel Waldfogel
-
Preference Externalities: An Empirical Study of Who Benefits Whom in Differentiated Product Markets
-
Geography and the Internet: Is the Internet a Substitute or a Complement for Cities?
By Todd M. Sinai and Joel Waldfogel
-
By Steven Berry and Joel Waldfogel
-
Mergers, Station Entry, and Programming Variety in Radio Broadcasting
By Steven Berry and Joel Waldfogel
-
By Chris Forman, Shane M. Greenstein, ...