TRIPS: A Link Too Far? A Proposal for Procedural Restraints on Regulatory Linkage in the WTO

Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, p. 215, 2006

57 Pages Posted: 2 May 2010

See all articles by Sean A. Pager

Sean A. Pager

Michigan State University - College of Law

Date Written: April 29, 2010

Abstract

Cross-issue linkage in trade negotiations provides a powerful tool to advance multilateral agreements by allowing negotiators to overcome vested interests that block progress on any one issue through offsetting concessions in unrelated areas. When used to advance regulatory harmonization, however, such linkage strategies present special dangers not present in the normal trade liberalization context. TRIPS, the WTO's landmark agreement harmonizing intellectual property rights, serves as a case study that exemplifies these dangers. The lessons of TRIPS should lead us to hesitate before embracing strategic linkage (or logrolling) as a procedural means to advance regulatory harmonization in other areas. This Article concludes by proposing procedural safeguards on regulatory linkage that would help to alleviate such concerns and promote greater confidence in future negotiations.

Keywords: international trade, TRIPS, intellectual property, WTO, linkage, harmonization

Suggested Citation

Pager, Sean A., TRIPS: A Link Too Far? A Proposal for Procedural Restraints on Regulatory Linkage in the WTO (April 29, 2010). Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, p. 215, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1597892

Sean A. Pager (Contact Author)

Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )

318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
48
Abstract Views
408
PlumX Metrics