Reclaiming the Immigration Constitution of the Early Republic

84 Pages Posted: 6 May 2010  

Date Written: May 3, 2010

Abstract

In contrast to the view that national immigration policy began in 1875, this article explores evidence that immigration policy dates from the early republic period. Built around the naturalization clause, which regulates the ability of aliens to own land and shaped their willingness to immigrate to America, this early republic immigration policy included strong norms of prospectivity, uniformity, and transparency. Drawing on these norms, which readily apply in both the naturalization and immigration contexts, the paper argues against the plenary power doctrine, particularly as it purports to authorize Congress to change the rules of immigration midstream and apply them to individuals who have already arrived in this country. The paper also argues against Congress’s practice of adopting private legislation. These contentions, in turn, provide the foundation for a criticism of the so-called public rights doctrine and its use to justify restrictions on the judicial role.

Keywords: Immigration, naturalization, constitutional history, early republic, plenary power

JEL Classification: K19, K39

Suggested Citation

Pfander, James E. and Wardon, Theresa, Reclaiming the Immigration Constitution of the Early Republic (May 3, 2010). Virginia Law Review, Vol. 96, No. 1, 2010; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 10-13. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1600412

James E. Pfander (Contact Author)

Northwestern University School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Theresa Wardon

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Paper statistics

Downloads
133
Rank
175,460
Abstract Views
920