Why the Beginning Should Be the End: The Argument for Exempting Post-Complaint Materials from Rule 26(B)(5)(A)’s Privilege Log Requirement

52 Pages Posted: 6 May 2010 Last revised: 21 Nov 2010

Date Written: May 4, 2010

Abstract

There is state of uncertainty that is threatening to undermine the two most significant evidentiary protections in American jurisprudence: the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require parties to explicitly assert privilege claims, usually by providing information about the privileged materials in the form of a "privilege log." The Rules do not say whether this requirement applies to materials created or obtained after the filing of the complaint. But that is exactly when the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine are most likely to protect not only the materials, themselves, but also the information about them that would normally be included in a privilege log. Despite that undeniable fact, the courts are bitterly divided on whether these "post-complaint" materials should be exempt from the privilege log requirement. In this article, I propose an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that would exempt post-complaint materials from the privilege log requirement. The attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine are intended to encourage communication between clients and attorneys and provide attorneys with a zone of privacy to prepare efficiently for trial, respectively. These activities are the most critical after the litigation has begun. Absent an exemption, an adversary could effectively require a party to create an ongoing "log" of communications and materials prepared during the course of a pending litigation. Such a burdensome requirement would effectively "chill" the crucial preparation that these protections were developed to ensure, subverting two key pillars of the adversary system. Indeed, the Supreme Court has modified procedural rules several times in the last decade in order to control the alarming effect of skyrocketing discovery costs. My proposal would fit soundly within this trend and also provide the badly needed certainty and predictability parties need in an era where the potential universe of discoverable electronic materials has few other limits.

Keywords: Privilege Log, Discovery, Attorney-Client Privilege, Work Product, Document Production, Civil Procedure, Evidence

Suggested Citation

Rennie, Douglas Campbell, Why the Beginning Should Be the End: The Argument for Exempting Post-Complaint Materials from Rule 26(B)(5)(A)’s Privilege Log Requirement (May 4, 2010). 85 Tulane Law Review 109 (2010), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1600490

Douglas Campbell Rennie (Contact Author)

U.S. Department of Justice ( email )

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
United States
2023057546 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
239
Abstract Views
1,498
rank
144,547
PlumX Metrics