Questioning Cultural Commons
Lawrence B. Solum
Georgetown University Law Center
May 6, 2010
Cornell Law Review, Vol. 95, 2010
Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 09-24
In Constructing Commons in the Cultural Environment, Michael J. Madison, Brett M. Frischmann, and Katherine J. Strandburg offer an innovative and attractive vision of the future of cultural and scientific knowledge through the construction of “cultural commons,” which they define as “environments for developing and distributing cultural and scientific knowledge through institutions that support pooling and sharing that knowledge in a managed way.” The kind of “commons” they have in mind is modeled on the complex arrangement of social norms that allocate lobstering rights among fishermen in Maine and extends to arrangements such as patent pools, open-source software development (e.g., Linux), and the modern research university.
This Response poses a series of questions about cultural commons. The first set of questions will interrogate the structure, boundaries, and coherence of the idea of “cultural commons”: that is, “What is a cultural commons?” The second set of questions will explore the fundamental assumptions of the case for these institutions: “What are the normative foundations for cultural commons?” The third set of questions will inquire into the feasibility of the proposal for cultural commons as a method for governing information: “Are cultural commons possible?” These questions are intended to rigorously interrogate the foundational assumptions of the very intriguing proposal offered by Madison, Frischmann, and Strandburg.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
Date posted: May 11, 2010