'Our Cities Institutions' and the Institution of the Common Law

Bernadette A. Meyler

Stanford Law School

May 7, 2010

Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, Forthcoming

The audiences of early modern English drama were multiple, and they intersected with the legal system in various ways, whether through the cross-pollination of the theaters and the Inns of Court, the representations of the sovereign’s justice performed before him, or the shared evidentiary orientations of jurors and spectators. As this piece written for a symposium on “Reasoning from Literature” contends, Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure addressed to these various audiences the question of whether the King should judge in person. In doing so, it drew on extant political theories suggesting that the King refrain from exposing himself to public censure by condemning criminals and also augured Sir Edward Coke’s subsequent resistance on the basis of the common law to King James I’s assertion of a right to sit in judgment. Rather than choosing between these positions, the play points out the deficiencies inherent in each and leaves its audiences - including both King James I himself and his subjects - to reason from the examples it provides.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: law and drama, judicial independence, Shakespeare, Sir Edward Coke, Inns of Court

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 11, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Meyler, Bernadette A., 'Our Cities Institutions' and the Institution of the Common Law (May 7, 2010). Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1601811

Contact Information

Bernadette A. Meyler (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,546
Downloads: 122
Download Rank: 183,218