Purchase - $38.00

Stone & Rolls Ltd V Moore Stephens: An Unnecessary Tangle

7 Pages Posted: 10 May 2010  

David Halpern

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Abstract

The opinions of the minority risk creating a dangerous inroad into Salamon and Caparo. The opinions of the majority avoid that risk but reach the right result by tortuous reasoning. The answer to the case lies in a proper application of Caparo.

Suggested Citation

Halpern, David, Stone & Rolls Ltd V Moore Stephens: An Unnecessary Tangle. Modern Law Review, Vol. 73, Issue 3, pp. 487-493, May 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1602183 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00795.x

David Halpern (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

No Address Available

Paper statistics

Downloads
3
Abstract Views
413