Bribery as Negotiation: A Decision Making Perspective

44 Pages Posted: 10 May 2010 Last revised: 14 Apr 2013

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 5, 2011

Abstract

The majority of research in conflict management focuses on conflict resolution: the process of reaching a mutually beneficial solution for the negotiating parties. However, some negotiations impart substantial negative externalities onto third parties, so resolving the conflict may not be a socially optimal solution. Bribery is one such example: potential bribe-givers and bribe-takers often negotiate on the price, speed and quality of services. The outcome of a “successful” negotiation may be a structurally unsound building, or a driver’s license holder who cannot drive. The current paper examines bribery from a behavioral decision making perspective, zooming in on the economic and moral motivations of the negotiating parties and argues that the assignment of moral responsibility for bribery exchanges may play a significant role in the process. The lessons and policy suggestions stemming from this framework are compared and contrasted to the currently dominant approaches for controlling corruption: economic incentives and publicity campaigns condemning bribery.

Keywords: Corruption, Bribery, Bargaining, Negotiation, Ethics, Decision Making

Suggested Citation

Atanasov, Pavel D., Bribery as Negotiation: A Decision Making Perspective (June 5, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1603362 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1603362

Pavel D. Atanasov (Contact Author)

Pytho LLC ( email )

866 President Street
Brooklyn, NY 11215
United States
7173335045 (Phone)
11215 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
181
Abstract Views
1,344
rank
91,161
PlumX Metrics