47 Pages Posted: 11 May 2010 Last revised: 4 Jan 2011
Date Written: May 10, 2010
While legal advocates have long understood that first impressions can strongly influence the decision-maker's view of their cases, so far legal scholars have not explored in any depth the growing body of research on the science of first impressions. This article remedies that by looking at the scientific studies of a psychological phenomenon called "priming." These studies reveal the subtle and surprising ways in which first impressions can be shaped to the legal advocate's advantage.
Priming is a phenomenon through which a person's reaction to information is influenced by her exposure to prior material. For example, priming studies show that if a person reads about golf, her first thought will tend to be "golfer" if someone later mentions Tiger Woods to her. Her first thought is likely to be quite different if someone has previously spoken to her about marriage or adultery. Because priming can change a person's reaction to information by exposing her to different introductory material, it has significant implications for legal advocacy.
This article examines the major studies on priming, with the goal of showing how legal advocates can use the lessons of the studies to make more persuasive arguments. The article also demonstrates how the psychological data on priming offer new and unique insights on how to use emotion in legal advocacy. Throughout the article, concrete examples show how legal advocates can use the science of priming to make strategic decisions. In sum, the article represents a first, serious step in studying this powerful tool that has potential application to all facets of legal advocacy.
Keywords: persuasion, priming, psychology, social science, brief writing, legal writing, persuasive writing, advocacy
JEL Classification: K40, K41, K49, K19
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Stanchi, Kathryn, The Power of Priming in Legal Advocacy: Using the Science of First Impressions to Persuade the Reader (May 10, 2010). Oregon Law Review, Vol. 89, No. 1, p. 305, 2010; Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010-7. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1604150
By Mark Osbeck
By Julie Baker