Approaches to Tax Avoidance Prevention in Seven Asian Jurisdictions: A Comparison

Asia Pacific Tax Bulletin, Vol. 15, pp. 22-39, 2009

9 Pages Posted: 14 May 2010 Last revised: 10 Apr 2015

See all articles by Zoë M. Prebble

Zoë M. Prebble

Victoria University of Wellington - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

This article compares the anti-avoidance approaches of South Korea, Japan, Indonesia, China, India, Malaysia and Singapore, addressing the statutory and judge-made general anti-avoidance rules in these jurisdictions.

The South Korea civil code sets out two general principles, intended to provide guidance in civil matters. These are the principle of good faith and the principle of prohibiting abuse of rights. However, these principles have not been directly or commonly accepted in South Korea with regard to tax matters. Japan has a targeted anti-avoidance rule aimed at deterring avoidance related to family company transactions. Articles 18 and 4 of the Indonesian Income Tax Act are the main specific anti-avoidance rules. China’s new Enterprise income Tax Law represents major changes from the previous tax regime. Owing to its British heritage, India has traditionally followed common law doctrine as opposed to civil law doctrine. Singapore has a general anti-avoidance rule in its tax code.

Keywords: Anti-Avoidance Rules, Tax Law

JEL Classification: K33, K34

Suggested Citation

Prebble, Zoë M., Approaches to Tax Avoidance Prevention in Seven Asian Jurisdictions: A Comparison (2009). Asia Pacific Tax Bulletin, Vol. 15, pp. 22-39, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1605505

Zoë M. Prebble (Contact Author)

Victoria University of Wellington - Faculty of Law ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand

HOME PAGE: http://people.wgtn.ac.nz/zoe.prebble

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
592
Abstract Views
2,824
rank
51,151
PlumX Metrics