Defending the Third-Party Doctrine: A Response to Epstein and Murphy

10 Pages Posted: 16 May 2010 Last revised: 13 Apr 2018

Date Written: May 14, 2009

Abstract

This is a brief response to papers by Richard Epstein and Erin Murphy on the third-party doctrine of Fourth Amendment law. Epstein's paper was published as Richard A. Epstein, Privacy and the Third Hand: Lessons from the Common Law of Reasonable Expectations, 24 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1199 (2009). Murphy's paper was published as Erin Murphy, The Case Against the Case for Third-Party Doctrine: A Response to Epstein and Kerr, 24 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1239 (2009).

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, third-party doctrine

Suggested Citation

Kerr, Orin S., Defending the Third-Party Doctrine: A Response to Epstein and Murphy (May 14, 2009). 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1229 (2009), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1608013

Orin S. Kerr (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
343
Abstract Views
3,184
Rank
184,214
PlumX Metrics