Defending the Third-Party Doctrine: A Response to Epstein and Murphy

10 Pages Posted: 16 May 2010 Last revised: 13 Apr 2018

See all articles by Orin S. Kerr

Orin S. Kerr

University of California, Berkeley School of Law

Date Written: May 14, 2009

Abstract

This is a brief response to papers by Richard Epstein and Erin Murphy on the third-party doctrine of Fourth Amendment law. Epstein's paper was published as Richard A. Epstein, Privacy and the Third Hand: Lessons from the Common Law of Reasonable Expectations, 24 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1199 (2009). Murphy's paper was published as Erin Murphy, The Case Against the Case for Third-Party Doctrine: A Response to Epstein and Kerr, 24 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1239 (2009).

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, third-party doctrine

Suggested Citation

Kerr, Orin S., Defending the Third-Party Doctrine: A Response to Epstein and Murphy (May 14, 2009). 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1229 (2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1608013

Orin S. Kerr (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley School of Law ( email )

Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
263
Abstract Views
2,047
rank
115,189
PlumX Metrics