39 Pages Posted: 25 May 2010 Last revised: 3 Apr 2015
Date Written: May 24, 2010
The Supreme Court has traditionally divided its application of the Eighth Amendment into two categories, capital and non-capital cases, based on the longstanding notion that “death- is-different.” In the recent case of Graham v. Florida, however, the Supreme Court applied its “evolving standards of decency” standard, heretofore reserved for capital cases, to a non-capital case in holding that the Eighth Amendment prohibited states from sentencing juvenile offenders to life without parole for non-homicide crimes. The dissenting justices argued that this decision marked the end of the Court’s “death-is-different” jurisprudence.
This article argues, however, that the decision instead creates the opportunity to establish a new category of Eighth Amendment review for life without parole sentences. While life without parole may not be as “different” from other sentences as death, it is still “different” enough to warrant its own set of heightened standards of Eighth Amendment review.
Part One of the article describes the dichotomy between capital and non-capital cases in the Supreme Court’s Eighth Amendment jurisprudence and the application of these two lines of cases in Graham v. Florida. Part Two of the article explains why life without parole, a sentence to die in prison, is “different” in its own way. Part Three then argues for the application of a new category of standards under the Eighth Amendment in life without parole cases, and suggests other possible implications of Graham.
Keywords: Graham, Eighth Amendment, life without parole, death penalty, death is different
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Berry, William W., More Different than Life, Less Different than Death (May 24, 2010). Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 71, No. 6, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1615148 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1615148