Mens Rea for Sexual Abuse: The Case for Defining the Acceptable Risk

Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol. 99, No. 1, 2009

50 Pages Posted: 25 May 2010

See all articles by Eric Alan Johnson

Eric Alan Johnson

University of Illinois College of Law

Date Written: October 15, 2008

Abstract

The persistence of strict criminal liability for child sexual abuse is attributable, at least in part, to the shortcomings of the existing alternatives, namely, the recklessness and criminal negligence standards. These two standards require juries to define the acceptable level of risk on a case-by-case basis. Juries are ill-equipped to make this calculation in sexual abuse cases, however, and their efforts to do so almost invariably are skewed by evidence of the victim’s unchastity. This Article first explores the shortcomings of the recklessness and criminal negligence standards in this setting, and then attempts to develop a viable alternative. Under the proposed alternative, the legislature, not the jury, would define the acceptable risk of sexual imposition. It would calculate this invariant probability threshold in much the same way that juries calculate the acceptable risk in recklessness and criminal negligence cases – by assigning values to the gravity of the potential harm and to the social utility of the conduct. Under this scheme, the jury would be responsible only for deciding whether the risk of sexual imposition exceeded this invariant probability threshold in the defendant’s case.

Keywords: Recklessness, negligence, sexual abuse

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Johnson, Eric Alan, Mens Rea for Sexual Abuse: The Case for Defining the Acceptable Risk (October 15, 2008). Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Vol. 99, No. 1, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1615677

Eric Alan Johnson (Contact Author)

University of Illinois College of Law ( email )

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
986
rank
366,940
PlumX Metrics