From Queen Bees and Wannabes to Worker Bees: Why Gender Considerations Should Inform the Emerging Law of Workplace Bullying

New York University Annual Survey of American Law, Vol. 65, No. 35, 2009

Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-03

54 Pages Posted: 27 May 2010 Last revised: 23 Jun 2010

See all articles by Kerri Lynn Stone

Kerri Lynn Stone

Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

This Article submits that the documented phenomenon of workplace bullying operates to stymie the retention and advancement of women in the workplace Research documented in books like Queen Bees and Wannabes shows that as early as the schoolyard, males and females tend to socialize differently, engage in and resolve conflict with peers differently, and absorb bullying behavior differently. Girls often believe or are taught to believe that direct conflict or confrontation is unpalatable and tend to employ more passive aggressive means of engagement with foes. They often internalize and repress feelings that boys are more likely to express. Viewing the workplace as an extension of the schoolyard, then, why shouldn’t we presume that these girls grow up, in at least substantial numbers, to become women who will, after being bullied, shrink back from future opportunities to with or be mentored by influential people? These girls are likely to become women who may very well decide that the quiet erosion of their dignity over time is not a viable use of their time, and they will ultimately self-select out of high stakes positions or opportunities, flee employment periodically in response to bullying, and may ultimately winnow themselves out of the workplace entirely.

This Article adds a new dimension to the groups’ entreaties by viewing workplace bullying through the lens of gender discrimination, albeit perhaps unwitting gender discrimination. It explores the disparate impact doctrine of liability and examines how its rationale, ideological underpinnings, framework, and viability as a vehicle might look against the backdrop of workplace bullying. The problems that this presents, however, are intractable because the precise nature of bullying, precisely how it affects one person versus another, and how victims are supposed to self-identify are all difficult to pin down. Ultimately, the best vehicle for redressing this aspect of workplace bullying remains somewhat elusive. In addition to contemplating possible uses of Title VII, this Article examines proposed state statutes, and posits the possible creation of a federal agency to deal with the problem in a manner that may not implicate a private right of action. It is only through increased awareness and renewed discussion of all of the discriminatory ramifications of bullying, that this last bastion of legally protected workplace abuse, which typically occurs behind closed doors and whose effects are too often obscured, will be stopped.

Keywords: workplace abuse, workplace bullying, disparate impact doctrine of liability, employment law, gender discrimination, sexual harassment, women, Title VII

Suggested Citation

Stone, Kerri Lynn, From Queen Bees and Wannabes to Worker Bees: Why Gender Considerations Should Inform the Emerging Law of Workplace Bullying (2009). New York University Annual Survey of American Law, Vol. 65, No. 35, 2009; Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-03. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1616156

Kerri Lynn Stone (Contact Author)

Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law ( email )

11200 SW 8th St.
RDB Hall 1097
Miami, FL 33199
United States
305-348-1154 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://law.lawnet.fiu.edu/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=264&Itemid=459

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
209
Abstract Views
1,624
rank
149,049
PlumX Metrics