In Search of a Theory of Deference: The Eighth Amendment, Democratic Pedigree, and Constitutional Decisionmaking

76 Pages Posted: 27 May 2010 Last revised: 6 Oct 2010

Eric Berger

University of Nebraska at Lincoln - College of Law

Date Written: May 27, 2010

Abstract

The Supreme Court’s recent Eighth Amendment death penalty case law is in disarray, and the confusion is symptomatic of a larger problem in constitutional doctrine. In Baze v. Rees and Kennedy v. Louisiana, the Court approached the challenged state policies with vastly different levels of deference. Though the Court purported to apply longstanding Eighth Amendment tests in both cases, Baze was highly deferential to state policy, and Kennedy was not deferential at all. Remarkably, neither the Court nor legal scholars have acknowledged, let alone justified, these contrasting approaches.

This Article proposes a theory of deference to address this discrepancy. Courts often premise deference in constitutional cases on political authority and epistemic authority. While these rationales make sense in theory, courts sometimes mechanically repeat them without asking whether the responsible institution enjoys either kind of authority in reality. Courts should engage in such inquiries before summarily granting or denying deference.

In light of these principles, the Court approached the problems of deference in Baze and Kennedy carelessly. Whereas Baze assumed (without explanation) that the state possessed political and epistemic authority worthy of deference, Kennedy assumed (also without explanation) the exact opposite. Attention to these issues in the Eighth Amendment and other constitutional contexts would encourage more transparent, deliberative policymaking and more careful, candid judicial constitutional decision making.

Keywords: Constitution, Deference, Eighth Amendment, death penalty, capital punishment, lethal injection, Baze, Kennedy, administrative law

Suggested Citation

Berger, Eric, In Search of a Theory of Deference: The Eighth Amendment, Democratic Pedigree, and Constitutional Decisionmaking (May 27, 2010). Washington University Law Review, Vol. 88, No. 1, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1616752

Eric Berger (Contact Author)

University of Nebraska at Lincoln - College of Law ( email )

103 McCollum Hall
P.O. Box 830902
Lincoln, NE 68583-0902
United States
402 472-1251 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
88
Rank
232,923
Abstract Views
930