Environmental Piercing of the Corporate Veil: The Norwegian Supreme Court Decision in the Hempel Case

European Company Law, Vol. 7, pp. 154–160, 2010

13 Pages Posted: 28 May 2010 Last revised: 1 Aug 2011

See all articles by Beate Sjåfjell

Beate Sjåfjell

University of Oslo - Faculty of Law

Date Written: May 27, 2010

Abstract

In this exciting meeting of environmental and traditional company law interests, a fundamental question is what the case - legally speaking - actually is about. Costs are imposed on a parent company based on the subsidiary’s polluting activity - and first and foremost that of the subsidiary’s predecessor. The legal basis cited in the Hempel case is the Norwegian Pollution Control Act Section 51. However, this provision does not designate the parent company of the subsidiary responsible for the pollution as a possible addressee for the claim. Does this case only concern interpretation of the provision, or is this - at least also - a type of piercing of the corporate veil?

The concept of piercing of the corporate veil is neither clearly defined nor generally agreed upon, not in Norwegian law and definitely not in a comparative European perspective. In this paper the result and the grounds of the Norwegian Supreme Court decision are discussed and sought placed in the broader legal landscape. The Hempel case represents something different in the piercing of the corporate veil debate. Some legal and economic consequences of the decision are indicated, including whether the decision may be perceived as an unlawful restriction on the free movement of capital or the freedom of establishment according to the EU Treaties. If followed up on by the Norwegian Supreme Court (and not torpedoed by the Court of Justice of the European Union), this case may provide an incentive for business that could prove to be one small step in the direction of better environmental protection.

All comments are welcome, including information about relevant cases from other jurisdictions!

Keywords: Piercing of the corporate veil, environmental protection, pollution, clean-up, parent company, subsidiary, merger, demerger, Norwegian Pollution Control Act

Suggested Citation

Sjåfjell, Beate, Environmental Piercing of the Corporate Veil: The Norwegian Supreme Court Decision in the Hempel Case (May 27, 2010). European Company Law, Vol. 7, pp. 154–160, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1616820

Beate Sjåfjell (Contact Author)

University of Oslo - Faculty of Law ( email )

PO Box 6706 St Olavsplass
Oslo, 0130
Norway

HOME PAGE: http://www.jus.uio.no/ifp/english/people/aca/beatesj/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
377
Abstract Views
3,788
rank
79,399
PlumX Metrics