Download This PaperEminent Domain, Exactions, and Railbanking: Can Recreational Trails Survive the Court’s Fifth Amendment Jurisprudence
84 Pages Posted: 31 May 2010
Date Written: 2001
Abstract
This article takes a close look at recreational trails (rail-trails as well as trails under the National Trails System Act) in light of recent takings jurisprudence, local land use regulations, state restrictions on land use requirements, and the plight of exactions in constitutional jurisprudence.
Keywords: Railbanking, Railroads, Property, Eminent Domain, Exactions, Land Use
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Wright, Danaya C., Eminent Domain, Exactions, and Railbanking: Can Recreational Trails Survive the Court’s Fifth Amendment Jurisprudence (2001). Columbia Journal of Environmental Law Vol. 26, No. 2, 2001. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1618608 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1618608
Danaya C. Wright (Contact Author)
University of Florida Levin College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
352-273-0946 (Phone)
352-392-3005 (Fax)
Register to save articles to
your library
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.
