Eminent Domain, Exactions, and Railbanking: Can Recreational Trails Survive the Court’s Fifth Amendment Jurisprudence

84 Pages Posted: 31 May 2010

See all articles by Danaya C. Wright

Danaya C. Wright

University of Florida Levin College of Law

Date Written: 2001

Abstract

This article takes a close look at recreational trails (rail-trails as well as trails under the National Trails System Act) in light of recent takings jurisprudence, local land use regulations, state restrictions on land use requirements, and the plight of exactions in constitutional jurisprudence.

Keywords: Railbanking, Railroads, Property, Eminent Domain, Exactions, Land Use

Suggested Citation

Wright, Danaya C., Eminent Domain, Exactions, and Railbanking: Can Recreational Trails Survive the Court’s Fifth Amendment Jurisprudence (2001). Columbia Journal of Environmental Law Vol. 26, No. 2, 2001. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1618608 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1618608

Danaya C. Wright (Contact Author)

University of Florida Levin College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
352-273-0946 (Phone)
352-392-3005 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
59
Abstract Views
753
rank
359,982
PlumX Metrics