Comparing Retirement Income Systems Through an Index
9 Pages Posted: 1 Jun 2010
Date Written: Spring 2010
Abstract
There is a great variety of retirement income systems around the world, but which ones are producing good outcomes? Which ones are sustainable into the future? The Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index considers more than forty indicators in calculating an index value for the systems in eleven countries spread over five continents. In this first-ever broad-based comparison, none of the eleven countries receive an ‘A’ grade. At the other end of the quality spectrum, none receive a failing ‘E’ either. However, the actual grade range from ‘B’ to ‘D’ reflects material differences in the quality of the eleven retirement income systems as measured by the Index.
Keywords: Adequacy, Pension Fund, Pension Reform, Pension Systems, Pillars, Saving, Sustainability
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Reforming Pensions: Principles, Analytical Errors and Policy Directions
By Nicholas Barr and Peter J. Diamond
-
Demographics, Fiscal Policy, and U.S. Saving in the 1980s and Beyond
-
The Mandatory Private Pension Pillar in Hungary: An Obituary
-
U.S. Demographics and Saving: Predictions of Three Saving Models
By Alan J. Auerbach, Jinyong Cai, ...
-
Pension Privatization in Crisis: Death or Rebirth of a Global Policy Trend?