What’s Wrong with Qualified Immunity?

21 Pages Posted: 4 Jun 2010 Last revised: 17 Jun 2010

Abstract

Originally delivered as the Dunwody Lecture at the University of Florida, this paper argues that “qualified immunity needs a course correction.” The Supreme Court’s attempt to strike a balance between the “importance of a damages remedy to protect the rights of citizens” and the “public interest in encouraging the vigorous exercise of official authority” (Harlow v. Fitzgerald) may have seemed sensible in the abstract, but has broken down in administration. Today, the law of qualified immunity is complicated, unstable, and overprotective of government officers. This paper documents those defects and proposes reforms designed to “get constitutional tort law back on track.”

Suggested Citation

Jeffries, John C., What’s Wrong with Qualified Immunity?. Florida Law Review, Vol. 62, 2010 ; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2010-21. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1619997

John C. Jeffries (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
434-924-3436 (Phone)
434-924-7536 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
917
Abstract Views
2,700
rank
24,181
PlumX Metrics