Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Property Takings in Developed Versus Developing Countries: Economics, Politics, and the Limits of the Holdout Problem

The Annual Proceedings of The Wealth and Well-Being of Nations

27 Pages Posted: 5 Jun 2010  

Edward J. Lopez

Western Carolina University

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 4, 2010

Abstract

In the spirit of the Upton Forum, I will take this opportunity to compare and contrast takings in developing versus developed countries (specifically the United States). I will argue that takings differ in the two realms by the political processes through which they pass, which reflects the different institutional and ideological contexts through which they are enacted. These political differences help explain the fact that the distributional effects operate in opposing directions in the two settings: from rich to poor in developing countries but from poor to rich in the United States. Yet there is an important similarity as well. Takings in both developed and developing countries alter people’s incentives for maintaining and investing in their property. This paper explores these margins of contrast between takings in the developed versus developing world, and then discusses implications for the primary economic justification of the takings power, known as the holdout problem. The holdout problem is an argument based on economic efficiency, but it does not account for two sources of inefficiency that I highlight here.

Suggested Citation

Lopez, Edward J., Property Takings in Developed Versus Developing Countries: Economics, Politics, and the Limits of the Holdout Problem (June 4, 2010). The Annual Proceedings of The Wealth and Well-Being of Nations. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1620705

Edward J. Lopez (Contact Author)

Western Carolina University ( email )

College of Business
Forsyth 224C
Cullowhee, NC 28723
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.edwardjlopez.com

Paper statistics

Downloads
26
Abstract Views
452