Prosecuting Terrorism - Models for Confronting Organized Violence

The Prosecutor in Transnational Perspective 293-313, Luna & Wade (Ed) Oxford U Press (2012).

26 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2010 Last revised: 1 Apr 2016

See all articles by Wayne McCormack

Wayne McCormack

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

Date Written: April 2, 2010

Abstract

This chapter reviews application of the two existing paradigms of law and crime to international terrorism. Terrorism is not an entity with which the model of war makes sense, and ordinary crime is not an adequate model for addressing the problem. Rather than contorting the traditions of either existing paradigm, it would be better to recognize the applicability of a third paradigm that has been applied successfully to piracy and slavery - the model of crimes erga omens under jus cogens which can be supported by military operations other than war (MOOTW). There is already the emerging supra-state body of international humanitarian law (IHL) to address offenses that are characterized by ongoing violence against civilians that is "widespread or systematic."

A valuable corollary is the US experience with racial terrorism and the so-called KKK statutes. The reason for supra-state intervention by international organizations into the affairs of a nation-state is the same as the reason for supra-state intervention by the U.S. federal government into the affairs of a U.S. state. It is the presence of an organization (whether recognized as the state or not) with sufficient resources to carry out violent actions against a civilian population without the state’s being willing or able to control it. This is the identical problem with terrorism today.

This realization feeds into the need for recognition of an international norm of counter-terrorism in which "widespread or systematic" attacks on civilians can be addressed by any nation with use of MOOTW. The model avoids most, but not all, of the confusion and problems that have surrounded the concept of "enemy combatant" in recent U.S. initiatives. Some of the problems not addressed are what to do with tortured miscreants such as KSM and how to address targeted killings – those are to be resolved by other analysis suggested at the end of this article.

Keywords: terrorism, war, crime, MOOTW

JEL Classification: K14, K33

Suggested Citation

McCormack, Wayne, Prosecuting Terrorism - Models for Confronting Organized Violence (April 2, 2010). The Prosecutor in Transnational Perspective 293-313, Luna & Wade (Ed) Oxford U Press (2012)., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1623847 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1623847

Wayne McCormack (Contact Author)

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )

383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
145
Abstract Views
1,231
Rank
319,165
PlumX Metrics