Punishment for Ecological Disasters: Punitive Damages and/or Criminal Sanctions

30 Pages Posted: 15 Jun 2010 Last revised: 26 Jul 2010

Leo Michael Romero

University of New Mexico School of Law

Date Written: Fall 2009

Abstract

This article addresses the means of punishing conduct that causes serious environmental harm like the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In particular, it considers the appropriateness and effectiveness of both punitive damages and criminal sanctions as remedies in such cases in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's approaches to reviewing both punitive damages awards and criminal sentences for excessiveness. This article recommends, first, that state legislatures should authorize and regulate punitive damages so that appellate courts will not interfere with punitive damages awards, as happened in the Exxon case. Second, states should enforce criminal provisions in environmental statutes against both corporate and individual offenders in order to enhance the deterrent effect that such laws have on corporations and their policies, and to express the moral outrage occasioned by culpable conduct harming the environment.

Suggested Citation

Romero, Leo Michael, Punishment for Ecological Disasters: Punitive Damages and/or Criminal Sanctions (Fall 2009). UNM School of Law Research Paper No. 2010-02; University of St. Thomas Law Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1625040

Leo Michael Romero (Contact Author)

University of New Mexico School of Law ( email )

1117 Stanford, N.E.
Albuquerque, NM 87131
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
92
Rank
226,385
Abstract Views
587