Do Consumer Price Subsidies Really Improve Nutrition?
43 Pages Posted: 21 Jun 2010 Last revised: 2 Jul 2023
There are 2 versions of this paper
Do Consumer Price Subsidies Really Improve Nutrition?
Date Written: June 2010
Abstract
Many developing countries use food-price subsidies or price controls to improve the nutrition of the poor. However, subsidizing goods on which households spend a high proportion of their budget can create large wealth effects. Consumers may then substitute towards foods with higher non-nutritional attributes (e.g., taste), but lower nutritional content per unit of currency, weakening or perhaps even reversing the intended impact of the subsidy. We analyze data from a randomized program of large price subsidies for poor households in two provinces of China and find no evidence that the subsidies improved nutrition. In fact, it may have had a negative impact for some households.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Geographic Inequity in a Decentralized Anti-Poverty Program: A Case Study of China
-
Giffen Behavior: Theory and Evidence
By Robert T. Jensen and Nolan H. Miller
-
The Impact of the World Food Price Crisis on Nutrition in China
By Robert T. Jensen and Nolan H. Miller
-
Do Consumer Price Subsidies Really Improve Nutrition?
By Robert T. Jensen and Nolan H. Miller
-
Reforming the Public Distribution System: Lessons from Chhattisgarh
By Raghav Puri
-
How Consumer Price Subsidies Affect Nutrition
By Neeraj Kaushal and Felix Muchomba
-
By Prasad Krishnamurthy, Vikram Pathania, ...
-
Public Distribution System Reforms and Consumption in Chhattisgarh: A Comparative Empirical Analysis
By Prasad Krishnamurthy, Vikram Pathania, ...