Different Things to Different People? The Meaning and Measurement of Trust and Confidence in Policing Across Diverse Social Groups in London

This an extended, pre-publication version of: Jackson, J. and Bradford, B. (2010). ‘What is Trust and Confidence in the Police?’, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4, 3, 241-248

25 Pages Posted: 24 Jun 2010 Last revised: 15 Mar 2013

See all articles by Ben Bradford

Ben Bradford

University College London - Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science

Jonathan Jackson

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Department of Methodology

Date Written: June 22, 2010

Abstract

One of the first actions of the new Home Secretary was to scrap public confidence as the single performance indicator of policing in England and Wales. But public trust and confidence will remain important to policing policy and practice. Trust and confidence can (a) encourage active citizen participation in priority setting and the running of local services, (b) make public bodies more locally accountable and responsive, and (c) secure public cooperation with the police and compliance with the law. Analysing survey data from London we find that overall 'public confidence' condenses a range of complex and inter-related judgements concerning the trustworthiness of the police. This is the case across different population groups and those with different experiences of crime and policing. Even recent victims and those worried about crime seem to place less priority on police effectiveness compared to police fairness and community alignment when responding to summary confidence questions. We argue that confidence summarises a motive-based trust that is rooted in procedural fairness and a social alignment between the police and the community. This social alignment is founded upon public assessments of the ability of the police to be a 'civic guardian' who secures public respect and embodies community values (Loader & Mulcahy, 2003). By demonstrating their trustworthiness to the public, the police can strengthen their social connection with citizens, and thus encourage more active civic engagement in domains of security and policing.

Please note: this is an extended version of: Jackson, J. and Bradford, B. (2010). ‘What is Trust and Confidence in the Police?’, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4, 3, 241-248.

Keywords: neighborhood disorder, fear of crime, collective efficacy, social trust

JEL Classification: K40, K42

Suggested Citation

Bradford, Ben and Jackson, Jonathan, Different Things to Different People? The Meaning and Measurement of Trust and Confidence in Policing Across Diverse Social Groups in London (June 22, 2010). This an extended, pre-publication version of: Jackson, J. and Bradford, B. (2010). ‘What is Trust and Confidence in the Police?’, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4, 3, 241-248. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1628546 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1628546

Ben Bradford (Contact Author)

University College London - Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science ( email )

35 Tavistock Square
London, WC1H 9EZ
United Kingdom

Jonathan Jackson

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Department of Methodology ( email )

Houghton Street
London, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom
+0044-207-955-7652 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
586
rank
44,400
Abstract Views
3,085
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information