A Giant with Feet of Clay: A First Law and Economics Analysis of the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR)

18 Pages Posted: 24 Jun 2010

See all articles by Filomena Chirico

Filomena Chirico

Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC)

Eric van Damme

TILEC and CentER, Tilburg University

Pierre Larouche

Université de Montréal; Center on Regulation in Europe (CERRE)

Date Written: June 22, 2010


This paper contains the conclusions from the work of the Economic Impact Group (EIG), a part of the CoPECL Network of Excellence funded by the EU to prepare a Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). Part 1 revisits basic principles which are central to the work of the whole group. For one, contract law is not just about remedying market failures, it is fundamentally a basic condition for markets to exist at all. Moreover, law and economics analysis looks for Pareto-efficiency and total welfare, without taking distributional considerations into account. Part 2 summarizes the contributions of the EIG members: they dealt with general issues of contract law (function of contract law, good faith, non-discrimination), the formation and interpretation of contracts (including standard terms), contractual performance (choice of remedies, standard for the assessment of damages), termination (including long-term contracts), specific areas such as insurance and consumer law, as well as non-contractual liability (interplay between contract and tort law, limits to extra-contractual liability). Part 3 draws general conclusions from these contributions. As regards the first question before the EIG (desirability of harmonization at European level), the costs of harmonization have been downplayed, so that the case for harmonization has probably been exaggerated, certainly as regards areas such a non-contractual liability where the DCFR cannot simply be an optional regime. As regards the second question assessed by the EIG (appropriateness of the provisions chosen in the DCFR), the work of the EIG reveals shortcomings: among others, rules have been formulated without a complete assessment of their rationales and the ex ante impact of the DCFR has been ignored. The drafters of the DCFR could have derived more added value from an economic analysis of their work than they seemed to acknowledge. Accordingly, while the DCFR is a momentous work of scholarship, it rests on fragile foundations.

Keywords: Draft Common Frame of Reference, DCFR, Harmonisation, Private Law

JEL Classification: K10, K12, K13

Suggested Citation

Chirico, Filomena and van Damme, Eric E.C. and Larouche, Pierre, A Giant with Feet of Clay: A First Law and Economics Analysis of the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) (June 22, 2010). TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2010-025, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1628558 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1628558

Filomena Chirico

Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC) ( email )

Warandelaan 2
Tilburg, 5000 LE

Eric E.C. Van Damme (Contact Author)

TILEC and CentER, Tilburg University ( email )

P.O. Box 90153
Tilburg, 5000 LE
+31 13 466 3045 (Phone)
+31 13 466 3066 (Fax)

Pierre Larouche

Université de Montréal ( email )

Montreal, Quebec H3T 1B9

Center on Regulation in Europe (CERRE) ( email )

Rue de l'Industrie 42
Brussels, 1040

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics