No Hints, No Forecasts, No Previews: Analyzing Supreme Court Nominee Evasiveness, 1955-2009

50 Pages Posted: 23 Jun 2010

See all articles by Dion Farganis

Dion Farganis

Elon University - Political Science

Justin Wedeking

University of Kentucky - Department of Political Science

Date Written: June 22, 2010

Abstract

Criticism of Supreme Court confirmation hearings has intensified considerably over the past two decades. In particular, there is a growing sense that nominees are now less forthcoming and that the hearings have suffered as a result. In this paper, we challenge that conventional wisdom. Based on a comprehensive content analysis of every question and answer in all of the modern confirmation hearings, we find only a mild decline in the candor of recent nominees. Moreover, we find that senators ask more probing questions than in the past, and that nominees are now more explicit when they refuse to respond – two factors that may be fueling the perception that evasiveness has increased in recent years. We close with a discussion of the normative implications of our findings as well as an outline for future research.

Keywords: supreme court, confirmation hearings, supreme court nominees, supreme court justices, judiciary committee, content analysis

Suggested Citation

Farganis, Dion and Wedeking, Justin, No Hints, No Forecasts, No Previews: Analyzing Supreme Court Nominee Evasiveness, 1955-2009 (June 22, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1628813 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1628813

Dion Farganis (Contact Author)

Elon University - Political Science ( email )

Gray Pavillion
Elon, NC 27244
United States

Justin Wedeking

University of Kentucky - Department of Political Science ( email )

1615 Patterson Office Tower
University of Kentucky
Lexington, KY 40506-0027
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
285
Abstract Views
3,447
rank
152,848
PlumX Metrics