Keynesian Historiography and the Anti-Semitism Question

History of Political Economy, Forthcoming

36 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2010 Last revised: 6 Jul 2010

See all articles by E. Roy Weintraub

E. Roy Weintraub

Duke University - Department of Economics

Date Written: June 29, 2010

Abstract

Historians’ treatment of John Maynard Keynes’s putative anti-Semitism raises complex historiographic issues. Melvin W. Reder’s (2000) paper, “The Anti-Semitism of some Eminent Economists” considered whether the term “ambivalent anti-Semitism” could be applied variously to John Maynard Keynes, Joseph Schumpeter, and Friedrich Hayek by arguing that those three important economists evinced attitudes or made remarks that today would be characterized as anti-Semitic. I am not concerned here to appraise Reder’s argument about whether the label “anti-Semitic”, “ambivalent” or not, is usefully attached to Keynes. I rather am concerned with the issue of how Keynesian historiography has dealt with the anti-Semitism question. That is, I am concerned with the role that Keynes’s possible anti-Semitism has played in Keynesian scholarship, and how the community of Keynes scholars has treated that allegation.

Keywords: John Maynard Keynes, anti-Semitism, historiography, biography

JEL Classification: B00, B2, B3, Z1

Suggested Citation

Weintraub, E. Roy, Keynesian Historiography and the Anti-Semitism Question (June 29, 2010). History of Political Economy, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1632600 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1632600

E. Roy Weintraub (Contact Author)

Duke University - Department of Economics ( email )

Durham, NC 27708-0097
United States
919-660-1838 (Phone)
919-684-8974 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.econ.duke.edu/~erw/erw.homepage.html

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
185
Abstract Views
1,302
rank
161,035
PlumX Metrics