Same-Sex Relationships and Anglo-Canadian Choice of Law: An Argument for Universal Validity

Canada Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 34, p. 103, 1996

34 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2010

See all articles by Wendy A. Adams

Wendy A. Adams

McGill University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: June 29, 2010

Abstract

The distinction between formal and essential validity in Anglo-Canadian choice of law regarding marriage is an illogical bifurcation that unnecessarily invalidates same-sex relationships contracted in foreign jurisdictions. The Supreme Court of Canada has recently reformulated certain rules of private international law, taking into account both the constitutional and sub-constitutional imperatives inherent in a federal setting and the need for order and fairness when co-ordinating diversity in the face of increasing globalization. Reform of the choice of law rules regarding the validity of foreign marriages should proceed accordingly with the result being that a marriage valid where celebrated is valid everywhere. No principled reason exists to deny recognition to same-sex relationships validly contracted in other jurisdictions, nor to differentiate between the rights and obligations arising from the legal status of same-sex and different-sex relationships.

Keywords: choice of law, private international law, same-sex marriage

Suggested Citation

Adams, Wendy Ann, Same-Sex Relationships and Anglo-Canadian Choice of Law: An Argument for Universal Validity (June 29, 2010). Canada Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 34, p. 103, 1996 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1632622

Wendy Ann Adams (Contact Author)

McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec H3A 1W9
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
53
Abstract Views
939
Rank
687,173
PlumX Metrics