71 Pages Posted: 15 Jul 2010
Date Written: September 1, 1998
Unbalanced budgets have sparked decades of debate among legislators, scholars, and the public at large. Although the controversy has abated somewhat in recent years, many continue to believe that Congress has a tendency to pursue a level of public debt that is both inefficient and unfair. Foremost among those who criticize the federal budgeting process are fiscal constitutionalists, a group of public choice scholars who believe the constitutional constraints are the only means by which the public will obtain protection from legislative fiscal irresponsibility. This article explores the public choice argument for a balanced budget amendment and argues that it may not be the best means to the preferred ends.
Keywords: taxation, tax policy, budgets, fiscal policy, constitutional reform
JEL Classification: K34, K39
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Staudt, Nancy C., Constitutional Politics and Balanced Budgets (September 1, 1998). University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 1988, No. 4, 1998; Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper 10-18. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1636012