A Tisket, a Tasket: Basketing and Corporate Tax Shelters

Leandra Lederman

Indiana University Maurer School of Law


Washington University Law Review, Vol. 88, p. 557, 2011
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 175

In an income tax system that comported with the economic, or Haig-Simons, definition of income, deductible expenses would not face source-based limitations. A true Haig-Simons income tax system therefore would not take the schedular approach of sorting different types of expenses and losses into distinct conceptual “baskets” containing corresponding types of income. Practical realities often require departing from the Haig-Simons norm, however. The U.S. federal income tax system does require individuals to basket a number of types of expenses and losses. For example, individuals’ passive activity losses can only be deducted from passive income gains. By contrast, most corporations taxed under Subchapter C of the Internal Revenue Code are not subject to many of these restrictions. Thus, corporations generally can deduct their passive/investment expenses and losses from their active business income. That ability allowed the creation of infamous tax strategies such as Son-of-BOSS and the CINS contingent installment sale shelter.

As a device to prevent the resurgence of abusive tax shelters, the article proposes to extend to the domestic corporate context the passive/active distinction that already exists for individuals. If corporations’ passive-source expenses and losses were required to be basketed with their passive income (such as income from interest; dividends; and rents and royalties, other than those produced by an active business), many abusive tax shelters involving financial products would not work. The article also considers the three principal objections to the proposal - that it is overbroad, underinclusive, and too complex - arguing that the proposal is tailored so as to minimize these costs.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: Income taxation, corporate tax, tax shelters, basketing, passive activity losses, schedular taxation

JEL Classification: K22, K34, K42

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 16, 2010 ; Last revised: July 11, 2013

Suggested Citation

Lederman, Leandra, A Tisket, a Tasket: Basketing and Corporate Tax Shelters (2011). Washington University Law Review, Vol. 88, p. 557, 2011; Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 175. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1639557

Contact Information

Leandra Lederman (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
(812) 855-6149 (Phone)
(812) 855-0555 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.indiana.edu/people/lederman
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,098
Downloads: 125
Download Rank: 172,390