Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women's Equality in Electoral Politics

32 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2010 Last revised: 30 Sep 2014

Jennifer L. Lawless

American University

Richard L. Fox

Loyola Marymount University

Date Written: 2010

Abstract

Based on the second wave of the Citizen Political Ambition Panel Study, we provide the first thorough analysis of how gender affects women and men’s efficacy to run for office. Our findings reveal that, despite comparable credentials, backgrounds, and experiences, accomplished women are substantially less likely than similarly situated men to perceive themselves as qualified to seek office. Importantly, women and men rely on the same factors when evaluating themselves as candidates; but women are less likely than men to believe they meet these criteria. Not only are women more likely than men to doubt that they have skills and traits necessary for electoral politics, but they are also more likely to doubt their abilities to engage in campaign mechanics. These findings are critical because the perceptual differences we uncover account for much of the gender gap in potential candidates’ self-efficacy and ultimately hinder women’s prospects for political equality.

Keywords: women candidates, political ambition, self-efficacy

Suggested Citation

Lawless, Jennifer L. and Fox, Richard L., Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women's Equality in Electoral Politics (2010). APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1642030

Jennifer L. Lawless (Contact Author)

American University ( email )

4400 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20016
United States

Richard L. Fox

Loyola Marymount University ( email )

7900 Loyola Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90045
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
138
rank
194,778
Abstract Views
762
PlumX