Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women's Equality in Electoral Politics
32 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2010 Last revised: 30 Sep 2014
Date Written: 2010
Abstract
Based on the second wave of the Citizen Political Ambition Panel Study, we provide the first thorough analysis of how gender affects women and men’s efficacy to run for office. Our findings reveal that, despite comparable credentials, backgrounds, and experiences, accomplished women are substantially less likely than similarly situated men to perceive themselves as qualified to seek office. Importantly, women and men rely on the same factors when evaluating themselves as candidates; but women are less likely than men to believe they meet these criteria. Not only are women more likely than men to doubt that they have skills and traits necessary for electoral politics, but they are also more likely to doubt their abilities to engage in campaign mechanics. These findings are critical because the perceptual differences we uncover account for much of the gender gap in potential candidates’ self-efficacy and ultimately hinder women’s prospects for political equality.
Keywords: women candidates, political ambition, self-efficacy
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace
By Adam Bonica
-
By Lindsay Nielson and Neil Visalvanich
-
Partisan Polarization and the Representation of Women in the U.S. Congress
-
Perceptions of Polarization: Examining Voter Responses to Candidate Extremity
By Neil Visalvanich and Nicole Bonoff
-
By Lindsay Nielson and Neil Visalvanich
-
Vox Populi, Vox Dei? Crowd-Sourced Ideal Point Estimation
By Adam Ramey