Shame and Religious Prosociality

35 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2010 Last revised: 15 Sep 2010

Date Written: 2010

Abstract

Religious-political entrepreneurs often claim that a more religiously-inspired society will promote ethical and community-minded behavior. Previous work has indeed demonstrated that people in religious contexts tend to exhibit more prosocial behavior than people in secular contexts. What explains this "religious advantage?'' I distinguish between two classes of motivations that may underlie this general finding: a "private'' motivation, such as a heightened regard for others' welfare or an awareness of divine observation, and a "community-based'' or public motivation, such as the fear of shaming or sanctioning by other people. I test these two mechanisms using a set of experiments in Indonesia in which I vary the anonymity of players and prime some subjects for religious identity. I find that the Islamic prime elicited strongly heightened generosity by Muslim men, but only when shaming is possible. The results lend support to the community-based view of religious ethics and show no evidence for a private motivation for the religious advantage.

Keywords: Religion, Islam, Indonesia, pro-social behavior, shame

Suggested Citation

Sachs, Natan, Shame and Religious Prosociality (2010). APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1644241

Natan Sachs (Contact Author)

Stanford University ( email )

Stanford, CA 94305
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
158
Abstract Views
981
Rank
398,399
PlumX Metrics