Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The ‘Second Labour Trilogy’: A Comment on R. v. Advance Cutting, Dunmore v. Ontario, and R.W.D.S.U. v. Pepsi Cola

Supreme Court Law Review, Vol. 16, pp. 67-102, 2002

19 Pages Posted: 21 Jul 2010  

Jamie Cameron

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

Date Written: 2002

Abstract

Advance Cutting, Dunmore, and Pepsi-Cola may have implications that extend beyond the constitutionalization of labour relations. After analyzing each in sequence, a concluding section considers their implications for other Charter issues.

Keywords: Labour trilogy, R. v. Advance Cutting, Dumore v. Ontario, RWDSU v. Pepsi Cola, Canada, Constitution, Charter, labour, labour law

JEL Classification: K39

Suggested Citation

Cameron, Jamie, The ‘Second Labour Trilogy’: A Comment on R. v. Advance Cutting, Dunmore v. Ontario, and R.W.D.S.U. v. Pepsi Cola (2002). Supreme Court Law Review, Vol. 16, pp. 67-102, 2002 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1646007

Jamie Cameron (Contact Author)

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )

4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada

Paper statistics

Downloads
85
Rank
249,631
Abstract Views
825