Intangible Assets Valuation by License Market and Stock Market: Cross-Industry Analysis Based on Royalty Rate and Tobin’s Q

les Nouvelles, June 2011

Posted: 23 Jul 2010 Last revised: 10 Jun 2011

See all articles by Jack Lu

Jack Lu

Intellectual Property Market Advisory Partners(IPMAP), LLC

Date Written: July 5, 2010

Abstract

There has been no previous research on the link between license market and stock market. Are the two markets integrated or coupled such that the valuation of the same portfolio of intangible assets is consistent cross market? This study tries to fill the research gap. Based on the data of royalty rate and Tobin’s Q across 14 industries, the analysis demonstrates that the two markets are partially integrated, and that the valuations of intangible assets by the two markets are highly related, after a dummy variable is introduced to control two outlying sectors.

This paper moves to test whether the partial integration between the two markets is caused by some random factors, or actually reflects more fundamental differences between the pricing behaviors of the markets. Two sets of regression analysis are conducted to associate royalty rate and Tobin’s Q with three fundamental indicators including R&D intensity, the relative size of intangible assets book value, and price markup. Several important conclusions are reached from the analysis. First and foremost, the stock of intangible assets carried on book is found to contribute significantly to royalty rate pricing in license market, but essentially irrelevant in stock market valuation. Most likely, stock market actually discounts the book value of intangible assets.

Second, stock market values R&D intensity or the flow of the R&D efforts significantly, and consistently across all industries studied. By contrast, license market positively prices R&D intensity only when the book value of intangible assets is included in the analysis. As a result, the book value of recognized intangible assets becomes the most important discriminator that differentiates the pricing behaviors of the two markets. This manifests that while both license market and stock market are forward-looking, the pricing in license market is backward-looking and path-dependent as well, i.e., it does impound the information embedded in the accumulated stock of intangible assets carried on book. Finally, three valuation models for license market are developed, and the one with the highest explanatory power indicates that royalty pricing is mostly determined by the book value of intangible assets and price markup.

Keywords: Intangible assets, valuation, license market, stock market, pricing behaviors, valuation models, royalty rate, Tobin’s Q, R&D intensity, book value of intangible assets, price markup, regression analysis

JEL Classification: O31, O32, O34, D45, L11, G19

Suggested Citation

Lu, Jiaqing, Intangible Assets Valuation by License Market and Stock Market: Cross-Industry Analysis Based on Royalty Rate and Tobin’s Q (July 5, 2010). les Nouvelles, June 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1646641

Jiaqing Lu (Contact Author)

Intellectual Property Market Advisory Partners(IPMAP), LLC ( email )

13785 Research Blvd,
Suite 125
Austin, TX 78750
United States
(512)238-3088 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.ipmapllc.com

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
871
PlumX Metrics