Journal of Intercultural Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4, 385 May 2014
19 Pages Posted: 26 Jan 2012 Last revised: 5 Dec 2014
Date Written: June 4, 2014
The Lautsi case attracted widespread attention in Europe and beyond. Though the issue in contention was a Christian symbol, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) judgements showed changes in assessment both about religion (in contrast with former cases regarding Muslim veils) and secularism (which did not have the same meaning for everyone). In light of those rulings, this paper reflects on the concepts of neutrality and secularism, and their normative implications for European citizens in terms of sense of belonging, solidarity, and cohesion. An open and plural public sphere, in which intercultural exchange can flourish, is crucial if Europe is serious about the integration of its immigrants, many of whom possess a Muslim background. A “post-secular” Europe may have to reconsider long-held stereotypes about religion, and nuance its self-understanding as “secular,” in a way that religious citizens can identify with Europe too. The discussion will draw on the ideas of Taylor, Casanova, Habermas, Weiler and Beck to illustrate some of the political, ethical and theoretical complexities of the Lautsi case in Italy, specifically issues to do with neutrality, secularism and the role of religion in the public sphere.
Keywords: European citizens, intercultural dialogue, neutrality, public sphere, religion, secularism, secularity, solidarity, Weltanschauungen
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Jiménez Lobeira, Pablo Cristóbal, Veils, Crucifixes and Public Sphere: What Kind of Secularism? Rethinking Neutrality in a Post-Secular Europe (June 4, 2014). Journal of Intercultural Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4, 385 May 2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1648711 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1648711